Even after giving a notice of impeachment motion to seven parties including the Congress against the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, Deepak Mishra, even though the judge’s case was considered to be a case of BH loya. But, this is a current link, in fact it is a case of Ayodhya. The Bench headed by Chief Justice Deepak Mishra has started hearing the issue of Ram Temple-Babri Masjid controversy pending in the top court since 2010 . Not only this, this Bench has taken a decision on its daily hearing. It is believed that hearing from the priority of Ram Temple case is also a reason for the Congress to pursue the impeachment motion.
The issue became more serious when four judges in the month of January constituted a press conference and accused that they keep all important matters with them. Not only this, the judges alleged that using the ill-use of the right to make the roster, they are handing out important matters like the Judge Loya Case to the benches of their choice. After this the controversy went deeper when the CJI-led Bench started hearing the Ayodhya case.
Please tell before Mishra Chief to Justice JS Khehar own the Ayodhya case Separating from the hearing, said that this issue should be resolved with mutual consent. BJP leader Subramanian Swamy had filed a plea and had given a talk of resolving the matter with mutual consent, but when Justice Khehar realized that Swamy was not a party in this matter, he rejected this offer.
it is noteworthy that while hearing the Ayodhya case, the Allahabad High Court had decreed two-thirds of the disputed land to Hindus and Muslims to give one-third share. Although this decision was not approved by any party and the parties filed petition in the Supreme Court.